How to Map the Paper Process Before It Kills your Close Date.
You have commercial agreement in principle but the deal has not signed. Legal, security, procurement, or vendor onboarding are still ahead of you.
In enterprise deals, the commercial yes and the signed contract are separated by a second process that runs on its own timeline. Procurement needs a vendor form. Legal wants redlines. Security runs a review. Each step has an owner and a lead time, and none of them care about your quarter. MEDDPICC adds Paper Process to the core MEDDIC framework precisely because this friction is where deals slip, not because buyers change their minds, but because the administrative path was never mapped.
Where it goes wrong
You forecast a deal for month-end based on a verbal yes. Then legal surfaces a data processing agreement you did not know about. Security needs four weeks for a review. The deal moves to next quarter. Your manager asks why you did not see it coming. The honest answer is that you never asked.
What you'll be able to do
You can identify every administrative step between verbal agreement and signature, assign an owner and a realistic lead time to each, and use that map to set an accurate close date and stay ahead of delays.
How to do it
Ask your champion early
Ask your champion early: 'What has to happen between us agreeing on terms and a contract being signed? Who owns each step?' Do this before you are in legal review, not after.
Build a simple list
Build a simple list: required documents, teams involved (legal, security, procurement, IT, finance), typical lead times for each, and who inside the buyer can accelerate them.
Work backwards from the buyer's target go-live date
Work backwards from the buyer's target go-live date. If security takes three weeks and legal takes two, your commercial close needs to happen five weeks before that date - not the day before.
Ask specifically
Ask specifically: 'Have you bought software at this contract value before? What surprised you about the process?' Past deals reveal real timelines better than optimistic estimates.
See the difference
Rep logs the deal as closing this month because the VP said 'let's do it.' No one has asked about procurement or legal. The security review requirement surfaces in week three. The deal closes six weeks late.
After the verbal yes, the rep asks the champion: 'Walk me through what happens next on your side - who touches this before it can be signed?' They learn procurement needs a vendor registration form (one week), legal will want to redline the DPA (two to three weeks), and security does a standard review (three weeks, can run in parallel with legal). The rep maps this, shares a realistic timeline with their manager, and sends the vendor form that afternoon to start the clock.
You can identify every administrative step between verbal agreement and signature, assign an owner and a realistic lead time to each, and use that map to set an
How you'll know it's working
You have got it when you can name every administrative step, its owner, and its lead time before you commit a close date to your forecast.
Questions people ask
How do you map the paper process before it kills your close date?
In enterprise deals, the commercial yes and the signed contract are separated by a second process that runs on its own timeline. Procurement needs a vendor form. You can identify every administrative step between verbal agreement and signature, assign an owner and a realistic lead time to each, and use that map to set an accurate close date
What is the most common mistake to avoid?
You forecast a deal for month-end based on a verbal yes. Then legal surfaces a data processing agreement you did not know about.
Hire with Assessment.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment