
You are reviewing your pipeline before a forecast call and realise you are not sure which deals actually belong in each stage
Most pipelines drift because stage labels are based on what the rep did, not what the buyer did. When a deal moves to 'Proposal' just because you sent one, the stage tells you nothing useful. Stage exit criteria flip this around - a deal only advances when the buyer has done something that proves it. That makes every stage a real signal, not a filing system.
Without clear exit criteria you end up defending deals in forecast reviews with vague answers. Managers lose trust in your numbers. You lose track of which deals are real. Quota attainment becomes a surprise either way.
You can define, in writing, what must be true for a deal to sit in each stage - and use that to clean your pipeline before any forecast conversation.
For each stage in your CRM, write one sentence starting with 'The buyer has ...' - not 'I have sent ...' or 'I have scheduled ...'. Buyer actions only.
Use a qualification framework like MEDDIC or BANT as a checklist. Treat each element as a binary gate per deal. If budget is unknown, the deal does not belong in late stages regardless of how good the conversation felt.
Once a week, go deal by deal and ask: does this deal still meet the exit criteria for its current stage? If not, move it back or close-lose it. Calendar a recurring 30-minute slot so it actually happens.
Share your criteria with your manager once. It signals you are thinking rigorously and makes forecast conversations faster.
Deal is in 'Proposal Sent' because you emailed a deck three weeks ago. No reply since. It stays there because you are not ready to give up on it.
Deal is in 'Proposal Sent' only because the buyer has confirmed the problem in writing, shared a budget range, named the decision-maker, and agreed to a follow-up call with a date on the calendar. No date, no stage.
You can define, in writing, what must be true for a deal to sit in each stage - and use that to clean your pipeline before any forecast conversation.
You have got it when your manager asks why a deal is in a given stage and you answer with a buyer action, not a rep activity - every time.
Most pipelines drift because stage labels are based on what the rep did, not what the buyer did. When a deal moves to 'Proposal' just because you sent one, the stage tells you nothing useful. You can define, in writing, what must be true for a deal to sit in each stage - and use that to clean your pipeline before any forecast conversation.
Without clear exit criteria you end up defending deals in forecast reviews with vague answers. Managers lose trust in your numbers.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment