
Mid-discovery, when you have basic context and want to move from neutral fact-finding toward the gap between where the buyer is now and where they want to be
Most AEs treat situation questions as admin - something to get through before the real conversation starts. But a well-placed context question can do double duty: it gathers a fact and simultaneously sets up the gap you will sell into. The question 'What does good look like here, and where are you actually landing against it?' is technically a situation question, but it forces the buyer to measure both ends of their own problem. That measurement is the foundation of every implication and value conversation that follows.
If you skip this step, your discovery produces a list of complaints with no anchor. You cannot quantify the gap, your business case is built on adjectives instead of numbers, and the buyer has no clear picture of what they are actually losing by staying where they are.
The AE can use two or three context questions to establish a measured current state - in the buyer's own words and numbers - that becomes the baseline for every impact and value question that follows.
Ask for the target before the gap. 'What does good look like for you here?' gets the buyer to name their own benchmark, which is more powerful than any benchmark you bring.
Then ask where they are landing. 'And where are you actually hitting against that?' makes the gap concrete without you having to assert it.
Push for a number, gently. If the buyer says 'we are not where we want to be,' follow with 'roughly - what would you put on that?' A number, even a rough one, is something you can build a case around.
Confirm the headline with the right person. End users give you the ground truth on the mechanics; the economic buyer can tell you whether the number matters at the business level. You often need both.
Use what they say as the thread. Once the buyer has described the gap in their own words, reference it back throughout the conversation rather than introducing your own framing.
Rep asks: 'So what are your conversion rates like?' Buyer says: 'They could be better.' Rep moves on to the next question. The gap never gets measured and the conversation stays vague.
Rep asks: 'What does a good conversion rate from first meeting to proposal look like for your team?' Buyer says: 'We should be at around 40 percent.' Rep follows: 'And where are you landing right now?' Buyer says: 'Closer to 22.' Rep: 'So roughly half of what you are aiming for - how long has it been sitting there?' The gap is now on the table in the buyer's own numbers, and the conversation has somewhere to go.
The AE can use two or three context questions to establish a measured current state - in the buyer's own words and numbers - that becomes the baseline for every
You have got it when you can close a discovery call with a specific, buyer-owned number that describes the gap - and the buyer is the one who put it on the table.
Most AEs treat situation questions as admin - something to get through before the real conversation starts. But a well-placed context question can do double duty: it gathers a fact and simultaneously sets up the gap you will sell into. The AE can use two or three context questions to establish a measured current state - in the buyer's own words and numbers - that becomes the baseline for every impact and value qu
If you skip this step, your discovery produces a list of complaints with no anchor. You cannot quantify the gap, your business case is built on adjectives instead of numbers, and the buyer has no clear picture of what they are actually losing by staying where they are.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment