
You are deciding whether to advance a deal to the next stage - or your manager is asking why a deal is where it is
Pipeline stages are only meaningful if they reflect what the buyer has actually done, not how you feel about the call. When stages are vague, every rep interprets them differently, forecasts become guesswork, and deals drift forward on optimism. Clear exit criteria - one to three customer actions required to leave each stage - turn stages into shared commitments rather than gut-feel labels.
Deals that move on vibes inflate the pipeline and distort the forecast. A deal in 'Proposal' that has no confirmed decision maker and no agreed success metrics is not really in Proposal - it is wishful thinking with a label on it. When those deals slip or die, it looks like a late-stage problem when it was actually a qualification problem weeks earlier.
Define one to three customer-action exit criteria for each of your active pipeline stages, and use a single question to gate every stage move: what did the customer do that justifies this?
Write exit criteria in customer-action terms, not rep-action terms. 'Sent proposal' is a rep action. 'Buyer confirmed they are reviewing it with the CFO by Friday' is a customer action.
Keep it to one to three criteria per stage. More than that and nobody uses them. Examples: Discovery exit - economic buyer identified and problem plus impact documented. Evaluation exit - success metrics agreed and next meeting on calendar. Contract exit - legal or procurement started.
Add a 'stage exit reason' dropdown field in HubSpot so reps record which criteria were met when they advance a deal. This takes 30 seconds and makes pipeline reviews much faster.
In your weekly pipeline review, ask for each deal in an active stage: what did the customer do to get here? If the answer is 'we had a good call,' that is a flag, not a justification.
If a deal cannot meet the exit criteria for its current stage, move it back or close it out. A smaller, honest pipeline is more useful than a large, padded one.
AE moves a deal from Discovery to Evaluation after a positive second call. No decision maker confirmed, no success metrics discussed. The deal sits in Evaluation for six weeks and eventually goes dark.
AE checks the exit criteria before moving the deal: economic buyer identified - yes, confirmed on the call. Problem and impact documented in the notes - yes. Next meeting on the calendar - not yet. AE does not advance the stage until the follow-up is booked. Deal moves to Evaluation two days later with a real next step attached.
Define one to three customer-action exit criteria for each of your active pipeline stages, and use a single question to gate every stage move: what did the cust
You have got it when you can defend every deal's stage in a forecast review by pointing to a specific customer action - not a feeling about the relationship.
Pipeline stages are only meaningful if they reflect what the buyer has actually done, not how you feel about the call. When stages are vague, every rep interprets them differently, forecasts become guesswork, and deals drift forward on optimism. Define one to three customer-action exit criteria for each of your active pipeline stages, and use a single question to gate every stage move: what did the customer do that justifi
Deals that move on vibes inflate the pipeline and distort the forecast. A deal in 'Proposal' that has no confirmed decision maker and no agreed success metrics is not really in Proposal - it is wishful thinking with a label on it.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment