
Here is something that took me too long to learn. One email almost never lands the meeting. The reply you want usually comes on the third or fourth try. So follow-ups are not a nice extra. They are the job. But there is a catch. If every follow-up says the same thing, you are just nagging. A good sequence is different each time, and that is what gets a reply.
Most people send the same pitch again and again. The second email is the first one with "just checking in" on top. The third is the same, a little more desperate. You can feel it as you write it. The buyer can feel it as they read it. Nothing new is on the table, so there is no new reason to reply. So they don't. The pitch was fine. Repeating it was the problem.
A good sequence comes at the buyer from a fresh angle every time. One email leads with a problem. The next shares a quick proof point. The next mentions a peer who had the same issue. The next drops a useful idea with no ask at all. Each one gives the buyer a brand new reason to look. You are not louder. You are more useful, one email at a time.
Don't write the next email when the last one flops. Map all six before you start so you can see the whole arc.
Jot six lines on one page: "1 problem, 2 proof, 3 peer, 4 idea, 5 question, 6 goodbye."
No two emails should make the same point. Rotate through a problem, a proof point, a peer story, and a helpful idea.
Email 2 is a stat. Email 3 is "a sales leader at meritt fixed this exact thing last quarter."
Read the six back together. If any two feel like twins, cut one and find a new angle. Each email earns its place or it goes.
Two emails both say "we save you time"? Keep the stronger one, swap the other for a peer story.
Email 1: "Worth a quick chat?" Email 2: "Just following up, worth a quick chat?" Email 3: "Circling back again, worth a quick chat?" Same ask, three times, getting needier. There is no new reason to reply, so the buyer keeps ignoring it.
Email 1: "Most sales leaders I speak to are losing good reps. Is that you?" Email 2: "One meritt customer cut early leavers by a third in a quarter." Email 3: "No ask today, just a short guide on spotting flight risk early."
Three different angles. Each gives the buyer a fresh reason to open and reply, instead of the same ask getting needier each time.
You've got this when each follow-up comes at the buyer from a fresh angle. Line up your last sequence and read it top to bottom. Does every email make a new point? Could you delete any one and lose something? If yes, you're there. Follow-ups feel like a chore when they repeat. They feel like a service when they change, and that is a skill that keeps deals alive long after one email would have died.
Plan about six follow-ups in a row. Most replies come after the third or fourth touch, so stopping at one or two leaves deals on the table. The key is that no two emails repeat the same point. Map all six before you start, give each its own angle, and end with a short goodbye email that often wins a late reply.
Each follow-up should hit a fresh angle, not repeat the last pitch. Rotate through a problem the buyer likely has, a proof point or number, a peer who had the same issue, and a useful idea with no ask. When every email gives the buyer a new reason to look, the sequence feels helpful instead of pushy, and more people reply.
Follow-ups usually get ignored because they repeat the same pitch with "just checking in" on top. The buyer already saw that message and passed. Saying it again adds no new reason to reply. Fix it by giving each follow-up its own angle, like a fresh proof point or a peer story, so every email offers something the buyer didn't have before.
Plan the whole sequence on one page before you send a single email. Write six lines, one per email, and give each a different angle: a problem, a proof point, a peer story, a useful idea, a clear question, and a short goodbye. Read them back together and cut any two that say the same thing. Planning up front keeps the arc fresh.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment